Difference between revisions of "Wordfast Server"
(updated WFS product brief link) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wordfast Server is more suitable for large companies which have tens of in-house and freelance translators and have the suitable resources for hosting the TM server and bear its costs. | Wordfast Server is more suitable for large companies which have tens of in-house and freelance translators and have the suitable resources for hosting the TM server and bear its costs. | ||
| − | [[Wordfast Classic]], [[Wordfast Pro]] and [[Wordfast Anywhere]] have the ability to integrate with Wordfast Server, the TM server application, which enables translators to access the same TMs and glossaries simultaneously, maximizing the amount of content that can be leveraged. For more information, please have a look at WFS product brief [ | + | [[Wordfast Classic]], [[Wordfast Pro]] and [[Wordfast Anywhere]] have the ability to integrate with Wordfast Server, the TM server application, which enables translators to access the same TMs and glossaries simultaneously, maximizing the amount of content that can be leveraged. For more information, please have a look at WFS product brief [https://wordfast.com/pdf/WF_Product-Brief_Server_v10.pdf here]. |
* [[Introduction]] | * [[Introduction]] | ||
Revision as of 21:00, 5 April 2018
Wordfast Server is more suitable for large companies which have tens of in-house and freelance translators and have the suitable resources for hosting the TM server and bear its costs.
Wordfast Classic, Wordfast Pro and Wordfast Anywhere have the ability to integrate with Wordfast Server, the TM server application, which enables translators to access the same TMs and glossaries simultaneously, maximizing the amount of content that can be leveraged. For more information, please have a look at WFS product brief here.
